network attribute|range
---|---
total nodes|12.0 - 1100.0
total edges|5.0 - 479.0
network density|0.0 - 0.124
average degree|0.016 - 3.49
degree heterogeneity|0.68 - 7.75
degree assortativity|-0.543 - 1.0
average betweenness centrality (unweighted)|0.0 - 0.034
average betweenness centrality (weighted)|0.0 - 0.034
average clustering coefficient (unweighted)|0.0 - 0.49
average clustering coefficient (weighted)|0.0 - 0.49
Newman modularity|0.0 - 0.805
maximum modularity|0.0 - 0.877
relative modularity|0.0 - 0.918
group cohesion|0.063 - 0.848
network diameter|0.063 - 0.848
**Study description**|**value**
Species|*Gopherus agassizii*
Taxonomic class|Reptilia
Population type|free-ranging
Geographical location|Nevada, USA
Data collection technique|radio tags
Interaction type|social projection bipartite
Definition of interaction|A bipartite network was first constructed based on burrow use - an edge connecting a tortoise node to a burrow node indicated burrow use by the individual. Social networks of desert tortoises were then constructed by the bipartite network into a single-mode projection of tortoise nodes.
Edge weight type|unweighted
Total duration of data collection|8 months
Time resolution of data collection (within a day)|
Time span of data collection (within a day)|focal follow/ad libitum
Note|Networks represent social data collected over different years and inactive (November�February)/active (March�October) season. 
**Citation** | Sah, Pratha, et al. "Inferring social structure and <br> its drivers from refuge use in the <br> desert tortoise, a relatively solitary species." Behavioral <br> Ecology and Sociobiology 70.8 (2016): 1277-1289.